Consulting

I'm available for consulting.
You can reach me at info@reidrosefelt.com

About Me

I've worked as a film publicist and film marketer on over a hundred films, from "Stranger Than Paradise" to "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and "Precious."  My full bio is here.

Click HERE for an interview with me on the Business2Community website.

AT&T 2: Phone Call from Roger Goldblatt of the FCC

Thursday, October 07, 2010

Some interesting developments since my last post. 

I was contacted  yesterday by Roger Goldblatt of the FCC, who asked to take part in a press conference  in Washington next Wednesday and speak about “Bill Shock.”  (There’s more information about the FCC event at the bottom of this post.)  I don’t think I’ll be able to go, but it’s fascinating—or scary?-- that my blog got into the hands of the FCC within days, don’t you think? I think it’s most likely because Andrew Sullivan linked it.  I hope that I will be able to contribute to the FCC’s effort in some way.  There should be laws against phone companies selling a few cents of data for thousands of dollars. 

I haven’t been near my computer lately so I wasn’t able to approve a lot of comments about my first post.  Apparently this was ALL MY FAULT. I could have found out all the info on the internet.  The fact that AT&T lied to me on tape is fine.  The fact that they only sell a maximum of 200MB of data in their international plan—nowhere near enough to have met my needs—that’s all fine.  Granted, my needs were very specific and few people would have my specific data requirements.  And if I had only been able to work in rooms that had wifi my bill would have been much lower.  But it would still have been outrageous.

Apparently if a multi-billion dollar corporation wants to sell two cents of data for hundreds of dollars that is peachy.  Let the buyer beware and do a lot of browsing.  Or stay home.

That same day I received a phone call from AT&T just as I was sitting down to lunch with a client.  The operator informed me that he was going to shut down my phone service that instant if I didn’t pay my bill immediately.  I said that was impossible, as I wasn’t anywhere near my computer.  He also said I had to pay the bill I hadn’t received yet in advance or he would turn off my phone service.  I said I’d pay everything  that night.  He wanted to know what time and how I would pay and how long it would take for the transfer to kick in, etc.   I thought to myself, okay, maybe I had forgotten the due date and, as I had to pay this bill anyway, I would do it tonight.   When I got home I discovered that my bill was due on October 11th, five days away.   Why was I being threatened with instantaneous  loss of service for a bill that wasn’t due yet?  Not to mention a bill I hadn’t even received yet?

AT&T confirmed that this call did come from them.  They had the name of the operator who called me at that time.  Of course his report on the call differed completely from mine. 

Am I paranoid or did this threatening phone call come because of the way my blog post has been tearing through the internet?  

Postscript: Here’s more information on the FCC Press Conference

Avoiding Cell Phone Bill Shock

October 13, 2010, 12:00pm – 1:00pm

Click here to watch the event live.

About This Event

Cell phones, smart phones, and other mobile devices are increasingly an essential part of Americans' everyday lives. But as minutes, messages, and megabytes quickly add up, avoiding "bill shock"—a sudden, unexpected increase in your monthly mobile bill—can be a challenge. According to a recent survey by the Federal Communications Commission, one in six mobile users—30 million Americans—have experienced bill shock. More than half those consumers saw an increase of $50 or more, but few were alerted by their mobile phone company—before or after the bill arrived.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski will join Sarah Rosen Wartell from the Center for American Progress to discuss his consumer agenda, including the proactive steps that the agency is taking to empower consumers with simple solutions for avoiding bill shock. At the event, the chairman will outline the findings of a new FCC paper on bill shock and hear directly from consumers who have experienced an unexpected increase in their mobile bills.

Featured Speaker:
Julius Genachowski, Chairman, Federal Communications Commission

Introduction by:
Sarah Rosen Wartell, Executive Vice President, Center for American Progress

A light lunch will be served at 11:30 a.m.

Click here to RSVP for this event

For more information, call 202-682-1611

Location

Center for American Progress
1333 H St. NW, 10th Floor
Washington, DC 20005

Map & Directions clip_image001
Nearest Metro: Blue/Orange Line to McPherson Square or Red Line to Metro Center

Tags:

Comments (10) -

10/8/2010 12:12:21 AM #

Reid-
I hope you go to testify. It will be your payback to the man (I mean AT&T) and will surely produce lots of juicy material for My Life as a Blog. Let's see if Big Brother (I mean AT&T) is watching. I'll buy you lunch if Goldblatt doesn't per diem!

lee levine | Reply

10/8/2010 5:22:05 AM #

No Roger says that the government doesn't pay. I can't go on Wednesday because I have a job, but if I was free I would happily pay the busfare so as not to increase the national deficit.  

Reid | Reply

10/8/2010 9:47:43 AM #

I think I told you, Reid, I got a $5000 data bill when I went to Israel for a month of work a couple of years.  Four Verizon customer service reps had told me my phone wouldn't work there, so I never turned off the data service on the phone. Turned out it did work there, and unbeknown to me, my phone was using the data service to check my emails every fifteen minutes. Complicating the story, my phone was wifi capable, and I'd connected to the network of my host, so I believed that was my data source.  I fought the bill for six months, but could not get to a single supervisor or anyone in authority for over SIX months (I'm guessing no one wanted to take the responsibility for making the decision). Kept paying the current charges, and battling intermittent disruption of my service.  I finally complained to the FCC.  I don't know if it was because of that, or that I finally by chance, managed to find a supervisor who would talk to me, but I eventually got the charges reversed.  It was a nightmare.

Sharon Kahn | Reply

10/8/2010 6:19:54 PM #

AT&T and other giant corporations are notorious for these types of business practices. The FCC works for them, so I wouldn't expect the FCC to do anything more than put on a big, expensive, tax-funded show with no significant consequences for AT&T.

Also, if you'd like to have your story read you should change your layout from white text on a blue background with yellow links to something else. It's really hard on the eyes.

Good luck with your pursuit.

Scott

Scott Allen | Reply

10/8/2010 6:20:58 PM #

You were not "raped" by AT&T. I'm sorry AT&T sucks but to characterize this as a rape is insensitive at best.

Alexandra | Reply

10/10/2010 5:26:48 PM #

Point well taken. I'll change it.

Reid | Reply

10/8/2010 8:20:41 PM #

I do feel for you. I feel at a loss when I do travel out of the country and turn off my phone because I fear the pain that will come with the bill.  I have T-Mobile and they put the automatic 411 on your contact list, I accidentally hit it once and even though I ended the call right away but they still charged me nearly 5 bucks for that second. I know that's nothing compared to what you're going through, but it's just another example of what they're doing to us. When you have to work and you NEED your phone you don't need a bunch of nimrods telling you YOU'RE the idiot for not turning off your phone. These are the same people who would be wetting themselves if they got a bill that was even half as big as yours. Fight. You have every right to.

And I found your blog through Roger Ebert's twitter...you are making an impact and maybe in the long run help the rest of us.

Annie | Reply

10/9/2010 7:14:46 AM #

You're not the first person this has happened to and I suspect you won't be the last since AT&T figures that since they hold the government contracts for phone service that they can get away with highway robbery.  

AT&T is a freaking monopoly and they have been allowed for too long to get away with this continued bull crap.  

I can only hope that the FCC finally steps up and does something about this, or that the SEC might finally decide that yes, AT&T is a monopoly once again and tell them that they have to split off certain arms again.

Heidi Reckel | Reply

10/9/2010 10:03:53 AM #

I feel your pain. I've avoided bill shock, but recently spent 4-1/2 hours on AT&T's despicable customer service mobius strip. They act with impunity, put you on hold and only provide partial support. There are no supervisors available ever, and if you do manage to talk to someone they admit they will not be held accountable for the quality of service they render. They fear no government regulation and negative press is considered transitory. This is why the Bell companies were broken up. Monopolies breed tyranny.

Alyss Dixson | Reply

10/10/2010 5:35:47 PM #

To be fair, I have spoken to some very good people at AT&T. One woman gasped when she heard the size of the bill.  I really felt that I was talking to a concerned human being.  But she said that the request had to go up four levels.  The end result was that there's no accountability from the people who actually have any power.  I had some very serious points to make and they just denied my request for a price adjustment with no explanation.  

But writing this blog post has put me in a regular correspondence with a guy from the FCC. Stay tuned.

Reid | Reply

Pingbacks and trackbacks (2)+

Add comment




  Country flag
biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading